Review outcomes

Review outcomes

When having reviewed a manuscript, the reviewer is often requested to provide the editorial office with a summary recommendation of the manuscript. The alternatives are usually

  • accept
  • minor revision
  • major revision
  • reject and resubmit
  • reject

The exact alternatives and definitions of the alternatives differ between editorial offices, but the recommendations accept and reject are generally unambiguous.

Of the remaining alternatives, a minor revision usually means clarifications, correction of language, terminology or definitions, but the changes are not expected to have any substantial effect on the contents of the manuscript. A major revision could include a statistical reanalysis or other changes that potentially render the manuscript substantially different, for example with a new aim or other conclusions. Major, but not necessarily minor, revisions are usually re-reviewed by the original reviewer.

Some journals only accept a limited number of major revisions. The alternative to reject and resubmit can then be used to reset the review procedure and start from scratch.

Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more.